Measuring the Success of Employee Resourcing Programs

 Assessing the effectiveness of human resourcing programmes is crucial for organisations to ensure they are efficiently acquiring, developing, and retaining the appropriate people. Time-to-fill is a crucial indicator that assesses the time it takes to complete the recruitment process and hire a candidate. It provides insight into the efficiency of the hiring process (Strohmeier & Piazza, 2015). Another crucial metric is the quality of hiring, which evaluates the performance and influence of newly recruited employees on organisational objectives (Boudreau & Ramstad, 2005). 

Staff retention rates are crucial indicators that offer valuable insights into the efficacy of resourcing programmes in cultivating staff loyalty and satisfaction (Dessler, 2019). Furthermore, monitoring the expense per recruitment aids in assessing the fiscal effectiveness of the hiring procedure, encompassing advertising, technology, and staff expenditures (Strohmeier & Piazza, 2015). 

Surveys and feedback systems, such as post-hire and exit interviews, yield qualitative data regarding applicant and employee experiences, enabling organisations to pinpoint areas for enhancement in their resourcing strategy (Marler & Boudreau, 2017).   Furthermore, doing a skill gap analysis allows for the evaluation of how well the abilities of the workforce connect with the goals of the organisation. This study guarantees that the talent being recruited is capable of meeting both present and future business requirements (Dessler, 2019). 

 

An all-encompassing method for measuring success is assessing the whole influence of resource allocation programmes on organisational performance, employee involvement, and strategic objectives. Balanced Scorecards, such as the one proposed by Kaplan and Norton in 1996, incorporate a range of measures that encompass financial, customer, internal operations, and learning and growth perspectives.   Organisations can assess the effectiveness of their employee resourcing initiatives by integrating quantitative and qualitative measurements. This approach allows for a thorough evaluation, facilitating data-driven decision-making and ongoing development. 

See you all in the next article!!!

References

Boudreau, J. W. & Ramstad, P. M., 2005. Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, 44(2), p. 129–136.

Dessler, G., 2019. Human Resource Management. s.l.:Pearson.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. s.l.:Harvard Business Press.

Marler, J. H. & Boudreau, J. W., 2017. An Evidence-Based Review of HR Technology Adoption. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), p. 28–44.

Strohmeier, S. & Piazza, F., 2015. Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Development: An International Perspective. s.l.:Routledge.